Metadata has meaning
Headers may describe exposure, date, dimensions, instrument settings and other acquisition context.
FITS files carry pixels and context. This activity helps learners inspect metadata, compare frames, recognize quality problems and defend a decision with evidence instead of choosing the brightest preview.

Universal FITS mode can analyze valid FITS datasets from different imaging workflows, subject to compatible data and metadata.
Headers may describe exposure, date, dimensions, instrument settings and other acquisition context.
Students compare star shape, background, apparent sharpness and session trends rather than relying on one number.
Select frames for stacking and explain why excluded frames were weaker or inconsistent.
Separate the pixel array from the header and discuss why astronomy needs machine-readable context.
Use frames from one session so students can compare changes without mixing targets or equipment.
Ask which frames may contain cloud, tracking movement, vibration, poor focus or unusually high background.
Run the same workflow across the dataset. Treat automated metrics as comparative indicators, not absolute scientific truth.
Open representative strong, borderline and weak frames. Look for agreement and disagreement with the metrics.
Export the chosen subset or workflow output and document the rules used to reach the decision.
Share the student level, available dataset and number of workstations.